diff options
| author | Dennis Brentjes <dennis@brentj.es> | 2018-09-04 19:28:20 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Dennis Brentjes <dennis@brentj.es> | 2018-09-07 00:21:35 +0200 |
| commit | 4cf29b0c3beacafd8565ca5461381f53832688ed (patch) | |
| tree | d70c95146ca8d72eb9017fce0e9c3e2e88308472 /content/abstract.tex | |
| parent | 1e316c9a7437580f499453cdafbb0c7433a46b88 (diff) | |
| download | thesis-4cf29b0c3beacafd8565ca5461381f53832688ed.tar.gz thesis-4cf29b0c3beacafd8565ca5461381f53832688ed.tar.bz2 thesis-4cf29b0c3beacafd8565ca5461381f53832688ed.zip | |
Diffstat (limited to 'content/abstract.tex')
| -rw-r--r-- | content/abstract.tex | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/content/abstract.tex b/content/abstract.tex index 79fbd54..87fd6a6 100644 --- a/content/abstract.tex +++ b/content/abstract.tex @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ \begin{abstract} -This paper describes a way to compare 2 different cryptographic backends for the cMix mix network. It tries to focus on making a fair comparison between the two and focuses mainly on the latency aspect of the cMix primitives. It concludes that although it still has some implementation specific problems the elliptic curve backend for cMix seems to be a faster alternative to the more conservative multiplicative group algorithm. +This paper describes a way to compare two different cryptographic backends for the \cmix mix network. The benchmark tries to focus on making a fair comparison between the two and focuses mainly on the latency aspect of the \cmix primitives. It concludes that although it still has some implementation specific problems the elliptic curve backend for \cmix is a faster alternative to the more conservative multiplicative group backend used in this benchmark. \end{abstract}
\ No newline at end of file |