From 33483109b741824e163210acfda07dfa96876cc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dennis Brentjes <d.brentjes@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 21:18:28 +0200
Subject: Some more twaeks to the LaTeX.

---
 content/discussion.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'content/discussion.tex')

diff --git a/content/discussion.tex b/content/discussion.tex
index b2a2f85..03d4de1 100644
--- a/content/discussion.tex
+++ b/content/discussion.tex
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 \newcommand{\mg}[0]{\emph{mg}\xspace}
 
-In this section \ec and \mg will refer to the 2 different implementations that we compare. They stand for elliptic curve and multiplicative groups.
+In this section \ec and \mg will refer to the 2 different implementations that we compare. They stand for elliptic curve and multiplicative group.
 
 So lets first talk about what our expectations are. The size of the messages being sent are different. The ed25519 implementation can send messages up to $31$ bytes. The 2048 bit multiplicative group can send up to $255$ bytes of data. This implementation uses a prefix to the message data that is the destination id. This takes up $20$ bytes of each message, as it is the SHA1 hash of the public key of the receiver. this means that the ed25519 implementation only sends $11$ bytes of payload versus $235$ bytes of payload for the multiplicative group implementation.
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2

