From 33483109b741824e163210acfda07dfa96876cc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dennis Brentjes <d.brentjes@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 21:18:28 +0200
Subject: Some more twaeks to the LaTeX.

---
 content/abstract.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'content/abstract.tex')

diff --git a/content/abstract.tex b/content/abstract.tex
index 8284b56..79fbd54 100644
--- a/content/abstract.tex
+++ b/content/abstract.tex
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 \begin{abstract}
-Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Donec quam felis, ultricies nec, pellentesque eu, pretium quis, sem. Nulla consequat massa quis enim. Donec pede justo, fringilla vel, aliquet nec, vulputate eget, arcu. In enim justo, rhoncus ut, imperdiet a, venenatis vitae, justo. Nullam dictum felis eu pede mollis pretium. Integer tincidunt. Cras dapibus. Vivamus elementum semper nisi. Aenean vulputate eleifend tellus. Aenean leo ligula, porttitor eu, consequat vitae, eleifend ac, enim. Aliquam lorem ante, dapibus in, viverra quis, feugiat a, tellus. Phasellus viverra nulla ut metus varius laoreet. Quisque rutrum. Aenean imperdiet. Etiam ultricies nisi vel augue. Curabitur ullamcorper ultricies nisi. Nam eget dui.
+This paper describes a way to compare 2 different cryptographic backends for the cMix mix network. It tries to focus on making a fair comparison between the two and focuses mainly on the latency aspect of the cMix primitives. It concludes that although it still has some implementation specific problems the elliptic curve backend for cMix seems to be a faster alternative to the more conservative multiplicative group algorithm.
 \end{abstract}
\ No newline at end of file
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2

